4.7 Article

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD8(+) T cells preferentially recognize heavily infected cells

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200306-837OC

Keywords

antigen presentation; CD4-positive T lymphocytes; CD8-positive T lymphocytes; cytotoxic T lymphocytes

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01AI48090, 1K08AI01644, 1KO8AI01645] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD33703] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI048090, K08AI001644, K08AI001645] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are important for successful immunity to tuberculosis and have redundant effector functions, such as cytolysis and release of potent antimycobacterial cytokines such as interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. We hypothesized that CD8(+) T cells play a unique role in host defense to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection as well. Possibilities include preferential and/or enhanced release of granular constituents and/or preferential recognition of heavily infected cells. Utilizing human, Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific, CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell clones, we demonstrate that, after recognition of antigen-presenting cells displaying peptide antigen, CD4(+) T cells preferentially release interferon-gamma, whereas CD8(+) T cells preferentially lyse antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, utilizing dendritic cells infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis expressing green fluorescent protein, we show that CD8(+) T cells preferentially recognize heavily infected cells that constitute the minority of infected cells. These data support the hypothesis that the central role of CD8(+) T cells in the control of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis may be that of surveillance; in essence, recognition of cells in which the containment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is no longer effective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available