4.6 Article

Comparison of morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine on respiratory depressant and antinociceptive responses in wild type and mu-opioid receptor deficient mice

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 862-870

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg279

Keywords

analgesics opioid; measurement techniques, plethysmography; model, knockout mouse; ventilation; ventilation, control of breathing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is a metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic properties. The influence of M6G on respiratory and antinociceptive responses was investigated in mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and compared with morphine. Methods. Experiments were performed in mice lacking exon 2 of the MOR (n= 18) and their wild type (WT) littermates (n=20). The influence of M6G and morphine on respiration was measured using whole body plethysmography during three elevations of inspired carbon dioxide. Antinociception was assessed using tail flick and hotplate tests. Results. In WT but not null mutant mice, a dose-dependent depression of the slope of the ventilatory carbon dioxide response was observed after M6G and morphine. Similarly, both opioids were devoid of antinociceptive effects in null mutant mice, but showed potent dose-dependent analgesia in WT animals. Potency differences between M6G and morphine in WT mice were of the same order of magnitude for analgesia and respiration. Conclusions. The data indicate that the desired (antinociceptive) and undesired (respiratory depression) effects of M6G and morphine are linked to the same gene product; that is the MOR. Other opioid- and non-opioid-receptor systems may play a minor role in the actions of M6Gs and morphine. The clinical implications of our findings are that any agent acting at the MOR will invariably cause (potent) analgesia in combination with (variable) respiratory depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available