4.5 Article

Resting tension characteristics in differentiating intact rat fast- and slow-twitch muscle fibers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages 2241-2247

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00990.2002

Keywords

skeletal muscle; rats; passive tension; viscoelasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The postnatal changes in resting muscle tension were investigated at 20degreesC by using small muscle fiber bundles isolated from either the extensor digitorum longus or the soleus of both neonatal (7-21 days old) and adult rats. The results show that the tension-extension characteristics of the bundles depended on the age of the rats. For example, both the extensor digitorum longus and soleus bundles of rats older than 14 days showed characteristic differences that were absent in bundles from younger rats. Furthermore, the tension-extension relation of the adult slow muscle fiber bundles were similar to those of the two neonatal muscles and were shifted to longer sarcomere lengths relative to those of the adult fast-fiber bundles. Thus, at the extended sarcomere length of 2.9 mum, the adult fast muscle fiber bundles developed higher resting tensions (5.6 +/- 0.5 kN/m(2)) than either the two neonatal (similar to3 kN/m(2)) or the adult slow (3.1 +/- 0.4 kN/m(2)) muscle fiber bundles. At all ages examined, the resting tension responses to a ramp stretch were qualitatively similar and consisted of three components: a viscous, a viscoelastic, and an elastic tension. However, in rats older than 14 days, all three tension components showed clear fast- and slow-fiber type differences that were absent in younger rats. Bundles from 7-day-old rats also developed significantly lower resting tensions than the corresponding adult ones. Additionally, the resting tension characteristics of the adult muscles were not affected by chemical skinning. From these results, we conclude that in rats resting muscle tension, like active tension, differentiates within the first 3 wk after birth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available