4.7 Article

Intracranial venous system: Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-trigered elliptic centric-ordered sequence - Initial experience

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 226, Issue 1, Pages 203-209

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2261020670

Keywords

cerebral blood vessels, MR; magnetic resonance (MR),technology; magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To evaluate gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered (ATECO) magnetic resonance (MR) venography for imaging of the intracranial venous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ATECO MR venography was performed in 23 patients, eight of whom also underwent two-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MR venography for imaging of the intracranial venous system. Seventeen predefined venous structures were evaluated on all venograms by two neuroradiologists. Visualization of venous structures was defined as completely visible (including clearly pathologic), partially visible, or not visible. Readers were also asked to compare the visibility of these predefined structures on ATECO and TOF MR venograms, where available. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients, six had dural venous sinus disease. Of the remaining 17 healthy patients, five underwent both ATECO and TOF MR venography and 12 underwent ATECO MR venography alone. On ATECO MR venograms obtained in the healthy patients, visibility of the 17 predefined venous structures was complete in 92% (531 of 578) of evaluations. For the five normal TOF MR venograms, the rate of complete visibility of the same venous structures was 61% (104 of 170). The rate of complete visibility of the large dural venous sinuses was 99% for ATECO MR venograms and 75% for TOF MR venograms. CONCLUSION: ATECO MR venography provides high-quality images of the intracranial venous anatomy and was superior to TOF MR venography for consistent complete visibility of venous structures. (C) RSNA, 2002.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available