4.6 Article

Toxicity and cellular responses of intestinal cells exposed to titanium dioxide

Journal

CELL BIOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 225-238

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10565-009-9132-z

Keywords

Intestine; Microvilli; Nanomaterials; Titanium dioxide; Toxicity

Funding

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency [RD831713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing use of nanomaterials in healthcare and industrial products heightens the possibility of their ingestion by humans, other mammals, and fish. While toxicity of many nanomaterials has recently been studied, reports of non-lethal effects of nanomaterials remain ill-defined. This study investigates possible pathways by which nanoparticles, titanium dioxide (TiO(2)), could cross the epithelium layer by employing both toxicity and mechanistic studies. This study provides evidence that at 10 mu g/mL and above, TiO(2) nanoparticles cross the epithelial lining of the intestinal model by transcytosis, albeit at low levels. TiO(2) was able to penetrate into and through the cells without disrupting junctional complexes, as measured by gamma-catenin. To monitor the epithelial integrity, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was employed and determined low concentrations (10 or 100 mu g/mL) of TiO(2) do not disrupt epithelial integrity. Live/dead analysis results did not show cell death after exposure to TiO(2). In addition, at 10 mu g/mL (and above) TiO(2) nanoparticles begin alteration of both microvillar organization on the apical surface of the epithelium as well as induce a rise in intracellular-free calcium. The latter is a mechanism cells use to respond to extracellular stimuli and may be linked to the alteration of the apical microvilli. Although TiO(2) does not show cell death, the implication of other, non-lethal, effects could lead to undesired outcomes (i.e., disease, malnutrition, shortened life span, etc.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available