4.6 Article

Home hospitalisation of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 58-67

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00015603

Keywords

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; healthcare costs; healthcare services; home care; hospitalisation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was postulated that home hospitalisation (HH) of selected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations admitted at the emergency room (ER) could facilitate a better outcome than conventional hospitalisation. To this end, 222 COPD patients (3.2% female; 71+/-10 yrs (mean+/-SD)) were randomly assigned to HH (n=121) or conventional care (n=101). During HH, integrated care was delivered by a specialised nurse with the patient's free-phone access to the nurse ensured for an 8-week follow-up period. Mortality (HH: 4.1%; controls: 6.9%) and hospital readmissions (HH: 0.24+/-0.57; controls: 0.38+/-0.70) were similar in both groups. However, at the end of the follow-up period, HH patients showed: 1) a lower rate of ER visits (0.13+/-0.43 versus 0.31+/-0.62); and 2) a noticeable improvement of quality of life (Delta St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), -6.9 versus -2.4). Furthermore, a higher percentage of patient's had a better knowledge of the disease (58% versits 27%), a better self-management of their condition (81% versus 48%), and the patient's satisfaction was greater. The average overall direct cost per HH patient was 62% of the costs of conventional care, essentially due to fewer days of inpatient hospitalisation (1.7+/-2.3 versus 4.2+/-4.1 days). A comprehensive home care intervention in selected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations appears as cost effective. The home hospitalisation intervention generates better outcomes at lower costs than conventional care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available