4.4 Review

The role of nuclear hormone receptors in cutaneous wound repair

Journal

CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND FUNCTION
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 1-13

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cbf.3086

Keywords

wound healing; tissue repair; nuclear receptors; vitamin D; regeneration; hormones; keratinocytes; innervation

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [1P20GM104318, P20GM0103423]
  2. US Department of Army (USAMRMC) [W81XWH-BAA]
  3. Department of Dermatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM104318, P20GM103423] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cutaneous wound repair process involves balancing a dynamic series of events ranging from inflammation, oxidative stress, cell migration, proliferation, survival and differentiation. A complex series of secreted trophic factors, cytokines, surface and intracellular proteins are expressed in a temporospatial manner to restore skin integrity after wounding. Impaired initiation, maintenance or termination of the tissue repair processes can lead to perturbed healing, necrosis, fibrosis or even cancer. Nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs) in the cutaneous environment regulate tissue repair processes such as fibroplasia and angiogenesis. Defects in functional NHRs and their ligands are associated with the clinical phenotypes of chronic non-healing wounds and skin endocrine disorders. The functional relationship between NHRs and skin niche cells such as epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts is pivotal for successful wound closure and permanent repair. The aim of this review is to delineate the cutaneous effects and cross-talk of various nuclear receptors upon injury towards functional tissue restoration. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available