4.5 Article

Galanin expression in adult human dorsal root ganglion neurons: Initial observations

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages 795-809

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00965-X

Keywords

calcitonin gene-related peptide; coexistence; nerve injury; neuropeptides; pain; substance P

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) were obtained during various procedures and processed for single and double in situ hybridisation using oligonucleotide probes complementary to three peptide mRNAs. Some postmortem ganglia were also analysed. In donor (unlesioned) DRGs 12.5% of the neuron profiles (NPs) were galanin mRNA-positive (mRNA(+)), 47.5% calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) mRNA(+) and 32.7% substance P mRNA(+). The corresponding percentages for cervical/thoracic DRGs from patients suffering from severe brachial plexus injury were 32.8%, 57.4% and 34.5%, respectively. In these DRGs a high proportion of the galanin mRNA' NPs contained CGRP mRNA and substance P mRNA. In DRGs from a patient with migraine-like pain a comparatively small proportion expressed galanin, whereas in DRGs from a herpes zoster patient galanin mRNA(+) NPs were comparatively more frequent. The results from human postmortem DRGs revealed only weak peptide mRNA signals. The present results demonstrate that galanin is expressed in DRGs not only in a number of animal species including monkey as previously shown, but also in a considerable proportion of human DRG neurons, often together with CGRP and substance P, and mostly in small neurons. Thus, galanin may play a role in processing of sensory information, especially pain, in human DRGs and dorsal horn. However, to what extent a similarly dramatic upregulation of galanin expression can be seen after peripheral nerve lesion in man, as has been reported for rat, mouse and monkey, remains to be analysed. (C) 2003 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available