4.5 Article

The association of the tetraspanin D6.1A with the alpha 6 beta 4 integrin supports cell motility and liver metastasis formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 116, Issue 21, Pages 4373-4390

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.00760

Keywords

alpha 6 beta 4 integrin; tetraspanin; metastasis; adhesion; motility

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The metastatic subline of a rat pancreatic adenocarcinoma differs from the non-metastasizing subline by overexpression of 5 membrane molecules: CD44 variant isoforms, EpCAM, the tetraspanin D6.1A, an uPAR-related molecule and, as described here, the alpha6beta4 integrin. An antibody-defined molecule was identified by mass spectrometry and cloning as alpha6beta4 integrin. Transfection-induced expression of alpha6beta4 in the non-metastasizing subline did not support migration on laminin 5 or tumor progression. However, when the non-metastasizing subline was doubly transfected to express alpha6beta4 and the D6.1A tetraspanin, intraperitoneally injected tumor cells frequently formed liver metastasis. For the following reasons we assume that metastasis formation is supported by an interaction between alpha6beta4 and D6.1A. (i) The 2 molecules can associate and co-localize. (ii) Co-localization strengthened by PKC stimulation. (iii) PKC stimulation, which induces a migratory phenotype, leads to a redistribution of alpha6beta4/D6.1A complexes. In resting cells, the molecules co-localize at the trail of the cell; during PKC stimulation they become transiently internalized and are (re-)expressed in the leading lamella. Thus, in the appropriate milieu, i.e. intraperitoneally, alpha6beta4 changes from an adhesion-supporting towards a migration-supporting molecule by its association with a tetraspanin. The findings provide a convincing experimental explanation for the repeatedly described involvement of alpha6beta4 in tumor progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available