4.7 Article

Genotype x environment interaction for milk production of daughters of Australian dairy sires from test-day records

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 86, Issue 11, Pages 3736-3744

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73980-0

Keywords

genotype x environment interaction; herd test day; random regression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Australia, dairy farming is carried out in environments that vary in many ways, including level of feeding and climate variables such as temperature and humidity. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of genotype x environment interactions ( G x E) on milk production traits ( milk yield, protein yield, and fat yield) for a range of environmental descriptors. The environment on individual test days was described by herd size (HS), average herd protein yield (AHTDP), herd test-day coefficient of variation for protein yield (HTDCV), and temperature humidity index (THI). A sire random regression model was used to model the response of a sire's daughters to variation in the environment and to calculate the genetic correlation between the same traits measured in two widely different environments. Using test-day records, rather than average lactation yields, allowed exploitation of within-cow variation as well as between-cow variation at different levels of AHTDP, and led to more accurate estimates of sire breeding values for response to environment. The greatest G x E observed was due to variation in AHTDP, with a genetic correlation of 0.78 between protein yield when AHTDP = 0.54 kg and protein yield when AHTDP = 1.1 kg ( the 5th and 95th percentile of the distribution of AHTDP). The G x E was also observed for THI, with a genetic correlation of 0.90 between protein yield at the 5th and 95th percentile of THI. The use of response to environment estimated breeding values to improve the accuracy of international sire evaluations is discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available