4.7 Article

Natural variation for seed oil composition in Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1077-1090

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00351-0

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; natural variation; seed lipid traits; FAE1; FAD3

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biochemical pathways involved in the biosynthesis and accumulation of storage lipids in seeds have been extensively studied. However. the regulatory mechanisms of those pathways, their environmental interactions,and the ecological implications of variation are poorly understood. We have initiated a new approach: the analysis of natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Three hundred and sixty accessions were surveyed for content of oil, very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in their seeds. The results revealed extensive natural variation. A core set of accessions, the seeds of which reproducibly contain extreme amounts of oil, VLCFAs and PUFAs have been identified. Reproducible oil content ranged from 34.6 to 46.0% of seed dry weight. VLCFA content ranged from 13.0 to 21.2% of total fatty acids. PUFA content, ranged from 53.3 to 66.1% of total fatty acids. Interactions were also identified for PUFA and VLCFA content of seeds with vernalisation of plants. Mapping of the regions of the genome involved in controlling the traits was conducted in an F-2 population and indicated that natural variation at the loci FAE1 and FAD3 might be involved in the regulation of VLCFA and PUFA content, respectively. A set of accessions. which capture a broad range of the natural variation for these traits available in A. thaliana, has been selected to form a core set which can be used to further dissect the genetics of the regulation of seed lipid traits and to identify the genes involved. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available