4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

The role of human achaete-scute homolog-1 in medullary thyroid cancer cells

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 134, Issue 6, Pages 866-871

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6060(03)00418-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [T32CA090217] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R21DK063015] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA 90217] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R21 DK 63015] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Human achaete-scute homolog-1 (hASH1) is a transcription factor that is expressed highly in neuroendocrine tumors such as medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Thyroid C-cells do not develop in hASH1 knockout mice, which suggests that hASH1 is essential for normal C-cell development. Methods. To determine the effect of raf-1 induction on hASH1 and hormone production, we used an estrogen inducible raf-1 construct in MTC cell line (TT) cells (TT-raf cells). TT or TT-raf cells were treated with control or I muM estradiol. After 48 hours, the cells were analyzed for levels of hASH1 and chromogranin A by Western blotting and for calcitonin production by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. Activation of raf-1 in the TT-raf cells resulted in high levels of phosphorylated MEK and ERK1/2, a morphologic transdifferentiation, and a decrease in chromogranin A and calcitonin levels that are associated with a reduction in hASH1 production. Furthermore, using MEK inhibitors, we demonstrated that these raf-1-mediated changes are dependent on MEK but not ERK1/2 activation. Conclusion. hASH1 down-regulation by raf-1 in MTC cells is associated with a significant decrease in hormone production. Thus, hASH1 appears to be important in the endocrine phenotype of MTC tumors and may serve as a molecular target for the treatment of patients with MTC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available