4.6 Article

Continuum and emission-line properties of broad absorption line quasars

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages 2594-2607

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/379293

Keywords

quasars : absorption lines; quasars : emission lines; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the continuum and emission-line properties of 224 broad absorption line quasars (BALQSOs) with 0.9less than or similar tozless than or similar to4.4 drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release, which contains 3814 bona. de quasars. We find that low-ionization BALQSOs (LoBALs) are significantly reddened as compared with normal quasars, in agreement with previous work. High-ionization BALQSOs (HiBALs) are also more reddened than the average non-BALQSO. Assuming SMC-like dust reddening at the quasar redshift, the amount of reddening needed to explain HiBALs is E(B-V)similar to0.023 and LoBALs is E( B-V)similar to0.077 (compared with the ensemble average of the entire quasar sample). We find that there are differences in the emission-line properties between the average HiBAL, LoBAL, and non-BAL quasar. These differences, along with differences in the absorption-line troughs, may be related to intrinsic quasar properties such as the slope of the intrinsic (unreddened) continuum; more extreme absorption properties are correlated with bluer intrinsic continua. Despite the differences among BALQSO subtypes and non-BALQSOs, BALQSOs appear to be drawn from the same parent population as non-BALQSOs when both are selected by their UV/optical properties. We find that the overall fraction of traditionally defined BALQSOs, after correcting for color-dependent selection effects due to different SEDs of BALQSOs and non-BALQSOs, is 13.4%+/-1.2% and shows no significant redshift dependence for 1.7less than or equal tozless than or equal to3.45. After a rough completeness correction for the effects of dust extinction, we find that approximately one in every six quasars is a BALQSO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available