4.7 Article

Spatial normalization of diffusion tensor MRI using multiple channels

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 1995-2009

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.008

Keywords

diffusion tensor; spatial normalization; tractography

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR013218] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH040799, K02MH001110, R01MH050740] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS039335] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR013218-02, P41 RR013218, P41-RR13218] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH040799-13, R01 MH 40799, R01 MH050740-06, R01 MH050740, R01 MH 50747, R01 MH040799, K02 MH 01110, K02 MH001110-06] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS039335, R01 NS 39335, R01 NS039335-02] Funding Source: Medline
  7. PHS HHS [11747] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffusion Tensor MRI (DT-MRI) can provide important in vivo information for the detection of brain abnormalities in diseases characterized by compromised neural connectivity. To quantify diffusion tensor abnormalities based on voxel-based statistical analysis, spatial normalization is required to minimize the anatomical variability between studied brain structures. In this article, we used a multiple input channel registration algorithm based on a demons algorithm and evaluated the spatial normalization of diffusion tensor image in terms of the input information used for registration. Registration was performed on 16 DT-MRI data sets using different combinations of the channels, including a channel of T2-weighted intensity, a channel of the fractional anisotropy, a channel of the difference of the first and second eigenvalues, two channels of the fractional anisotropy and the trace of tensor, three channels of the eigenvalues of the tensor, and the six channel tenser components. To evaluate the registration of tensor data, we defined two similarity measures, i.e., the endpoint divergence and the mean square error, which we applied to the fiber bundles of target images and registered images at the same seed points in white matter segmentation. We also evaluated the tensor registration by examining the voxel-by-voxel alignment of tensors in a sample of 15 normalized DT-MRIs. In all evaluations, nonlinear warping using six independent tensor components as input channels showed the best performance in effectively normalizing the tract morphology and tensor orientation. We also present a nonlinear method for creating a group diffusion tensor atlas using the average tensor field and the average deformation field, which we believe is a better approach than a strict linear one for representing both tensor distribution and morphological distribution of the population. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available