Journal
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 148, Issue 1, Pages 38-49Publisher
SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1264-9
Keywords
sequence learning; implicit learning; procedural learning; intermanual transfer
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Previous studies using simple, repeating patterns have suggested that the knowledge gained in early sequence learning is not effector-specific in that it transfers to muscle groups other than those used during training. The current experiments extended these findings to transfer after extensive practice with probabilistic sequences using a task on which people fail to gain declarative knowledge of the regularity. Specifically, an alternating serial reaction time (ASRT) task was used in which predictable and unpredictable trials alternated. L Participants responded for the first five sessions using their right hand, then switched to the left hand for the sixth session. Stimuli were spatial in the first experiment and nonspatial in the second. Significant near-perfect transfer of pattern knowledge was seen in both experiments, suggesting that muscle-specific information for either the fingers or the eyes cannot explain the observed learning.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available