4.8 Article

A study of the characteristics of activated carbons produced by steam and carbon dioxide activation of waste tyre rubber

Journal

CARBON
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages 1009-1016

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00449-9

Keywords

activated carbons; activation; adsorption; adsorption properties; porosity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a study into the effect of different activation conditions on the porosity and adsorption characteristics of carbon adsorbents produced from waste tyre rubber. For the purpose of this work, three carbon series were produced using different activation temperatures (between 925 and 1100degreesC) and oxidising agents (steam or carbon dioxide). Carbons produced to different degrees of burn off were characterised using gas (nitrogen) and liquid phase (phenol, methylene blue and Procion Red H-E2B) adsorption. Total micropore volumes and BET surface areas increased almost linearly with the degree of activation to 0.554 ml/g and 1070 m(2)/g, respectively, while the development of external surface area was particularly rapid at degrees of activation above 50 wt% burn off. Steam was observed to generate a narrower but more extensive microporosity than carbon dioxide. However, carbon dioxide produced carbons of slightly larger external surface areas. Activation at higher temperatures resulted in pores of slightly larger dimensions, although this was only evident in highly activated samples. Porosity characteristics were reflected in the capacity of the carbons to adsorb species of different molecular size from solution. In this respect, steam-activated carbons presented greater capacities for the adsorption of smaller molecular size compounds (phenol), while carbon dioxide-activated carbons adsorbed larger textile dyes more effectively. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available