4.6 Review

Animal models of allergic and inflammatory conjunctivitis

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 58, Issue 11, Pages 1101-1113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00326.x

Keywords

allergic; animal model; conjunctivitis; guinea-pig; murine; ocular allergy; rat; rhinitis; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allergic eye diseases are complex inflammatory conditions of the conjunctiva with an increasing prevalence and incidence. The diseases are often concomitant with other allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and allergic asthma. Despite the disabling and prominent symptoms of ocular allergies, they are less well studied and further insights into the molecular basics are still required. To establish new therapeutic approaches and assess immunological mechanisms, animal models of ocular allergies have been developed in the past years. The major forms of allergic ocular diseases seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis, vernal and atopic keratoconjunctivitis and giant papillary conjunctivitis, each have different pathophysiological and immunological components. In contrast to these distinct entities, the current animal models are based on the sensitization against a small number of allergens such as ovalbumin, ragweed pollen or major cat allergens and consecutive challenge. Different animal species have been used so far. Starting with guinea-pig models of allergic conjunctivitis to assess pharmacological aspects, new models including rats and mice have been developed which mimic major features of ocular allergy. The presently preferred species for the investigation of the immunological basis of the disease is represented by murine models of allergic conjunctivitis. In the future, combined ocular, nasal and aerosolic challenges with allergens may provide a model of allergy that encompasses simultaneously the target organs eye, nose and airways with conjunctivitis, rhinitis and asthma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available