4.7 Article

Hype rhomocysteinemia as a component of syndrome x

Journal

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
Volume 52, Issue 11, Pages 1491-1495

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0026-0495(03)00262-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Syndrome X, a cluster of several metabolic disorders that includes hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension, is associated with severe vascular morbidity. Hyperhomocysteinemia is another risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, often exhibited by insulin-resistant patients. In the current study, we investigated the relationship between syndrome X and hyperhomocysteinemia in a rat model. Two groups of rats were fed either fructose-enriched diet or standard rat chow for 5 weeks. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), as well as fasting plasma insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and total homocysteine levels, were determined at the beginning and at the end of the study. A complete metabolic syndrome was induced by the fructose-enriched diet, including hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension. Homocysteine concentration was 72% higher after 5 weeks on the fructose diet (8.49 +/- 1.6 v 4.92 +/- 0.9 mumol/l, P < .01). Insulin, triglycerides, SBP, and homocysteine levels were insignificantly changed during 5 weeks on standard rat chow. Homocysteine was positively and significantly correlated with any original component of syndrome X (r = 0.565, P = .014 with insulin, r = 0.662, P = .001 with triglycerides, and r = 0.774, P < .001 with SBP). The results of the present study indicate that hyperhomocysteinemia is an integral component of this rat model of syndrome X. It is thus highly likely that hyperhomocysteinemia is an integral component of the human syndrome X as well, and thereby contributes to the overall high vascular risk associated with this condition. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available