4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene fumarate)s

Journal

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 2183-2192

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00139-3

Keywords

enzymatic degradation; unsaturated polyesters; poly(butylene succinate); poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene fumarate); lipase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of aliphatic biodegradable polyesters modified with fumaric residues was synthesized by transesterification in the melt of dimethyl succinate, dimethyl fumarate and 1,4-butanediol. The amount of unsaturation, originating from the fumaric acid residues in the polyesters chains was varied from 5 to 20 mol%. The molecular structure and composition of the polyesters were determined by H-1 NMR spectroscopy. The effects of the content of fumaric residues on the thermal and thermo-oxidative properties of the synthesized polyesters were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis. The degree of crystallinity was determined by DSC and wide angle X-ray scattering. The degrees of crystallinity of the unsaturated copolyesters were reduced, while the melting temperatures were higher in comparison to poly(butylene succinate). Biodegradation of the synthesized copolyesters was estimated in enzymatic degradation tests using a buffer solution with Rhizopus arrhizus lipase at 37 degreesC. Although the degree of crystallinity of the copolyesters decreases slightly with increasing unsaturation, the biodegradation is not enhanced suggesting that not only the chemical structure and molecular stiffness but also the morphology of the spherulites has an influence on the biodegradation properties. The highest biodegradability was observed for the copolyesters containing 5 and 10 mol% of fumarate units. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available