4.7 Article

QuikSCAT wind retrievals for tropical cyclones

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 41, Issue 11, Pages 2616-2628

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.814913

Keywords

hurricane; ocean wind; rain attenuation; rain scattering; scatterometer; tropical cyclone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of QuikSCAT data for wind retrievals of tropical cyclones is described. The evidence of QuikSCAT sigma(0) dependence on wind direction for >30-m/s wind speeds is presented. The QuikSCAT sigma(0) s show a peak-to-peak wind direction modulation of similar to1 dB at 35-m/s wind speed, and the amplitude of modulation decreases with increasing wind speed. The decreasing directional sensitivity to wind speed agrees well with the trend of QSCAT1 model function at near 20 m/s. A correction of the QSCAT1 model function for above 23-m/s wind speed is proposed. We explored two microwave radiative transfer models to correct the attenuation and scattering effects of rain for wind retrievals. One is derived from the collocated QuikSCAT and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I) dataset, and the other one is a published parametric model developed for rain radars. These two radiative transfer models account for the effects of volume scattering, scattering from rain-roughened surfaces and rain attenuation. The models suggest that the sigma(0) s of wind-roughened sea surfaces for 40-50-m/s winds are comparable to the sigma(0) s of rain contributions for up to about 10-15 mm/h. Both radiative transfer models have been used to retrieve the ocean wind vectors from the collocated QuikSCAT and SSM/I rain rate data for several tropical cyclones. The resulting wind speed estimates of these tropical cyclones show improved agreement with the wind fields derived from the best track analysis and Holland's model for up to about 15-mm/h SSM/I rain rate. A comparative analysis of maximum wind speed estimates suggests that other rain parameters likely have to be considered for further improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available