4.2 Article

Up-regulation of connexin45 in heart failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1205-1212

Publisher

BLACKWELL FUTURA PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03276.x

Keywords

connexins; gap junctions; heart failure; remodeling; confocal microscopy

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL050598, R01HL066350, R01HL058507] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 66350, HL 50598, HL 58507] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Heart failure is associated with reduced expression of the major gap junction protein connexin43 (Cx43), which may contribute to arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in this patient population. Other cardiac connexins may be altered as well. Because connexin45 (Cx45) has been shown to colocalize with Cx43, we determined whether the number, size, or distribution of Cx45 gap junctions is altered in the failing heart. Methods and Results: Cx45 expression levels were measured by immunoblotting and quantitative immunostaining in failing and control human left ventricles. Total Cx45 protein was significantly (P = 0.021) up-regulated 1.8-fold in failing hearts. Cx45 immunohistochemical signal was increased by 80% (P = 0.005) due to a 3.5-fold increase in the number of gap junctions containing Cx45. Cx45 mRNA was not altered in failing hearts, suggesting reduced degradation of Cx45 protein in the failing heart. Cx43 signal, on the other hand, was reduced by 49% in failing hearts. Double-label experiments demonstrated colocalization of Cx45 and Cx43 in the same gap junctions. Conclusion: Cx45 is markedly enhanced in the failing heart. Up-regulation of Cx45 in conjunction with down-regulation of Cx43 could result in abnormal impulse propagation and generation of ventricular arrhythmias, thereby predisposing patients in heart failure to sudden cardiac death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available