4.8 Article

Checkpoint failure and chromosomal instability without lymphomagenesis in Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) mice

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1511-1523

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00455-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA92625] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL67580] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI35714] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NICHD NIH HHS [HD37502] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM59413] Funding Source: Medline
  6. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD037502] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA092625] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K08HL067580] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI035714] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM059413, R37GM059413] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, mice expressing one of the two Mre11 alleles inherited in the human ataxia-telangiectasia like disorder (A-TLD) were derived. The mutation had a profound maternal effect on embryonic viability, revealing an acute requirement for Mre11 complex function in early embryogenesis. Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) mice exhibited several indices of impaired ATM function. The mice also exhibited pronounced chromosomal instability. Despite this phenotypic spectrum, the animals were not prone to malignancy. These data indicate that defective cell cycle checkpoints and chromosomal instability are insufficient to significantly enhance the initiation of tumorigenesis. In contrast, the latency of malignancy in p53(+/-) mice was dramatically reduced. We propose that in Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) mice, genome instability and cell cycle checkpoint defects reduce viability in early embryos and in proliferating cells, while promoting malignancy in the context of an initiating lesion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available