4.7 Article

Physiological and biochemical responses of two cultivars of wheat to elevated levels of CO2 and SO2, singly and in combination

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 121, Issue 2, Pages 189-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00222-1

Keywords

elevated CO2; SO2; wheat; physiological characteristics; metabolites; enzymes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In view of the present increasing trends of anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and sulphur dioxide (SO2) throughout the world, the present study was aimed at investigating the long-term influence of elevated concentrations of CO2 and SO2, singly and in combination on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of two cultivars of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Malviya 234 and HP1209). For this purpose, the plants were grown in open top chambers under field conditions and were fumigated with 600 PPM CO2, 0.06 ppm SO2 and 600 ppm CO2 + 0.06 ppm SO2 separately for 8 h daily (0800-1600 h) from germination to grain maturity. The individual treatment of SO2 advers#ely affected both the cultivars of wheat by reducing protein and starch contents. The respiration rate, total soluble sugars and total phenolics, however, increased in response to SO2. Stimulation of photosynthesis rate and reduction in stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were observed under CO2 treatment. Concentrations of total soluble sugars, starch and total phenolics increased in response to CO2 and CO2 + SO2 treatments. In combined treatment, CO2 modified the plant response to SO2 in both the cultivars. Elevated CO2 increased the photosynthesis rate under combined treatment. Higher levels of starch and soluble sugars under combined treatment provided extra carbon for SO2 detoxification. The pattern of intraspecific response of wheat to different treatments was more or less similar, but the magnitude of response differed significantly. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available