4.6 Article

Patterns of antimicrobial activities from soil actinomycetes isolated under different conditions of pH and salinity

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 4, Pages 814-823

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02049.x

Keywords

actinomycetes; antibacterial and antifungal compounds; antimicrobial screening; pH and salinity conditions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To evaluate the patterns of the production of antimicrobial compounds by diverse collection of actinomycetes isolated from different geographies under alternative conditions of pH and salinity in the media. Methods and Results: Actinomycetes were grouped based on their method of isolation and their phenotype diversity was determined by total fatty acid analysis. A total of 335 representative isolates, including 235 Streptomyces species and 100 actinomycetes from other taxa, were screened for the production of antimicrobial activities against a panel of bacteria, filamentous fungi and yeasts, including some of clinical relevance. Production of antimicrobial activities was detected in 230 strains. In the case of the genus Streptomyces, 181 antimicrobial activities (77% of the tested isolates) were recorded. The activities observed among the other actinomycetes taxa were lower (49% of the tested isolates). Conclusions: The results of this study support the idea that species of actinomycetes isolated in alternative selective conditions of pH and salinity present a significant capacity to produce compounds with antibacterial or antifungal activity. The best group of isolates in terms of production of active secondary metabolites was the one isolated in saline conditions. Significance and Impact of the Study: The results demonstrate that these actinomycetes strains isolated in alternative selective conditions of pH and salinity and collected from diverse geographical locations present a significant capacity to produce compounds with antibacterial or antifungal activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available