Journal
CELL AND TISSUE BANKING
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 451-459Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-013-9411-z
Keywords
Corneal endothelium; Cell count; Eye bank; Fixed-frame; Quality control; Reliability assessment
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The aim of this work was to analyze the magnitude of inherent errors associated with the fixed-frame counting method for corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) measurements. This technique is common among most eye banks worldwide. Three types of mosaics were used: regular and irregular tessellated mosaics (eight increasing densities ranging from 800 to 3,600 cells/mm(2) by steps of 400 cells/mm(2)) generated by a computer, and real mosaics (four specimens) obtained from human corneal endothelium flat mounted and stained with Alizarin red. On the three mosaics, the fixed-frame counting method was applied using a computer program. The ECD was calculated for 3,000 successive random positions from calibrated grids which area ranged from 50 x 50 to 300 x 300 mu m(2) (incremental steps of 25 mu m). For each grid, the ECD was expressed either as a single count, a mean of five or a mean of 10 measures. The fixed-frame count was constantly associated with an inherent variability but repeatability increased with larger grid size and ECD. The mean calculated out of 10 measures was the most reliable, but still, we noted +/- 5 % of residual variability from the real ECD. The 100 x 100 mu m(2) grid manual counts, performed in many eye banks, should be abandoned and upgraded to at least 200 x 200 mu m(2) grid counts. Digital image analysis with a variable frame counting method would be the best alternative.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available