4.8 Article

Memory B Cells Activate Brain-Homing, Autoreactive CD4+ T Cells in Multiple Sclerosis

Journal

CELL
Volume 175, Issue 1, Pages 85-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2013ADG 340733]
  2. Clinical Research Priority Program MS (CRPPMS) of the University of Zurich (UZH)
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Sinergia grant UnmetMS
  4. SwissMSsociety
  5. Swedish Society for Medical Research
  6. Swedish Foundation for MS Research
  7. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  8. SNF [3347CO-108792]
  9. Swedish Medical Research Council [2012-2284, 2014-3077]
  10. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  11. Swedish Brain Foundation
  12. MAUS foundation
  13. Multiple Sclerosis National Research Institute
  14. NEURO Sweden
  15. UK MS Society Tissue Bank [007/14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that is caused by the interplay of genetic, particularly the HLA-DR15 haplotype, and environmental risk factors. How these etiologic factors contribute to generating an autoreactive CD4(+) T cell repertoire is not clear. Here, we demonstrate that self-reactivity, defined as autoproliferation'' of peripheral Th1 cells, is elevated in patients carrying the HLA-DR15 haplotype. Autoproliferation is mediated by memory B cells in a HLA-DR-dependent manner. Depletion of B cells in vitro and therapeutically in vivo by anti-CD20 effectively reduces T cell autoproliferation. T cell receptor deep sequencing showed that in vitro autoproliferating T cells are enriched for brain-homing T cells. Using an unbiased epitope discovery approach, we identified RASGRP2 as target autoantigen that is expressed in the brain and B cells. These findings will be instrumental to address important questions regarding pathogenic B-T cell interactions in multiple sclerosis and possibly also to develop novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available