4.4 Article

Relationship of outdoor air quality to pediatric asthma exacerbations

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 28-33

Publisher

AMER COLL ALLERGY ASTHMA IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63610-1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although exposure to outdoor air pollutants has been shown to be associated with exacerbations of asthma, there are relatively few admissions for asthma to Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH during the summer months when air quality tends to be worst. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship of outdoor air quality parameters to asthma exacerbations in children. Methods: The number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for asthma were determined by review of emergency department logs and the hospital computer database. Outdoor air concentrations of ozone, particulates of <10 mum diameter (PM-10), pollens, and fungal spores were obtained from the Hamilton County Department of Environmental Services. Multiple regression analysis was performed, looking for relationships between the daily number of asthma visits and the air quality data for the same day and for 1 through 5 days before the visits. Results: A significant association was found between the number of asthma visits and the daily pollen count (P = 0.014, SE 0.001). The effect was stronger for visits 1, 2, and 3 days after the pollen count (P < 0.001 for pollen count lagged 3 days). High PM-10 counts were synergistic with the pollen count as a predictor of asthma visits. There was no association between asthma visits and the ozone concentration or fungal spore count. Conclusions: Exacerbations of asthma severe enough to require visits to the hospital were associated with elevated concentrations of airborne pollens and particulates, with a significant delayed effect. Ozone, in the concentrations measured here, was not a risk factor for severe asthma exacerbations in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available