4.8 Article

Differentiation of Type 1 ILCs from a Common Progenitor to All Helper-like Innate Lymphoid Cell Lineages

Journal

CELL
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages 340-356

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.030

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERC [311377, 207057]
  2. EMBO
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB992/B02, SPP1646-DI764/3, TA436/2-1, TA436/3-1]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether Stipend) [AR732/1-1]
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal
  7. MOTIVATE Promotionskolleg
  8. Else-Kroner-Fresenius Stiftung
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. [FWF-SFB28]
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [207057, 311377] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are a recently recognized group of lymphocytes that have important functions in protecting epithelial barriers against infections and in maintaining organ homeostasis. ILCs have been categorized into three distinct groups, transcriptional circuitry and effector functions of which strikingly resemble the various T helper cell subsets. Here, we identify a common, Id2-expressing progenitor to all interleukin 7 receptor-expressing, helper-like ILC lineages, the CHILP. Interestingly, the CHILP differentiated into ILC2 and ILC3 lineages, but not into conventional natural killer (cNK) cells that have been considered an ILC1 subset. Instead, the CHILP gave rise to a peculiar NKp46(+) IL-7R alpha(+) ILC lineage that required T-bet for specification and was distinct of cNK cells or other ILC lineages. Such ILC1s coproduced high levels of IFN-gamma and TNF and protected against infections with the intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Our data significantly advance our understanding of ILC differentiation and presents evidence for a new ILC lineage that protects barrier surfaces against intracellular infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available