4.6 Article

Increased proteasome-dependent degradation of estrogen receptor-alpha by TGF-beta 1 in breast cancer cell lines

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 181-190

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10353

Keywords

breast cancer; estrogen receptor alpha; transforming growth factor beta; ubiquitin; proteasome; cell proliferation

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA073698, P30CA016058] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA073698, R01 CA73698, P30 CA016058, R01 CA073698-04A1, P30 CA16058] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normal mammary epithelial cells are rapidly induced to G, arrest by the widely expressed cytokine, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta1). Studies in established breast cancer cell lines that express the estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) have demonstrated loss of this responsiveness. This inverse correlation suggests interpathway signaling important to cell growth and regulation. The adenocarcinoma breast cell line BT474, which was not growth arrested by TGF-pl, was used as a model of estrogen-inducible growth to explore interpathway crosstalk. Although BT474 cells were not growth-arrested by TGF-beta1 as determined by flow cytometry analysis and 5'-bromo-3'-deoxyuridine incorporation into DNA, estrogen receptor protein levels were attenuated by 100 muM TGF-beta1 after 6 h. This decrease in ERalpha reached 50% of untreated control levels by 24 h of treatment and was further supported by a 50% decrease in estrogen-inducible DNA synthesis. Inspection of ERalpha transcripts suggested that this decrease was primarily the result of altered ERalpha protein stability or availability. Use of the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, abolished all effects on ERalpha by TGF-beta1. Collectively, this data supports a role for TGF-beta1 in regulating the growth of otherwise insensitive breast cancer cells through modulation of ERalpha stability. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available