4.8 Article

Dihydropyrimidine Accumulation Is Required for the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Journal

CELL
Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages 1094-1109

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.032

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 CA103866, AI047389, K99 CA168940]
  2. Life Science Research Foundation and Ludwig Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. American Cancer Society fellowship [PF-12-099-01-TGB]
  4. Sally Gordon Fellowship of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRG112-12]
  5. American Cancer Society-Ellison Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship [PF-13-356-01-TBE]
  6. Ruth L. Kirchstein NRSA F30 fellowship
  7. Hope Funds for Cancer Research Fellowship [HFCR-13-03-03]
  8. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program [BC123066]
  9. NIH grants [CA112967, ES015339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is increasingly appreciated that oncogenic transformation alters cellular metabolism to facilitate cell proliferation, but less is known about the metabolic changes that promote cancer cell aggressiveness. Here, we analyzed metabolic gene expression in cancer cell lines and found that a set of high-grade carcinoma lines expressing mesenchymal markers share a unique 44 gene signature, designated the mesenchymal metabolic signature'' (MMS). A FACS-based shRNA screen identified several MMS genes as essential for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), but not for cell proliferation. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), a pyrimidine-degrading enzyme, was highly expressed upon EMT induction and was necessary for cells to acquire mesenchymal characteristics in vitro and for tumorigenic cells to extravasate into the mouse lung. This role of DPYD was mediated through its catalytic activity and enzymatic products, the dihydropyrimidines. Thus, we identify metabolic processes essential for the EMT, a program associated with the acquisition of metastatic and aggressive cancer cell traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available