4.8 Article

Molecular Architecture of the 40S • eIF1 • eIF3 Translation Initiation Complex

Journal

CELL
Volume 158, Issue 5, Pages 1123-1135

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EMBO postdoctoral fellowship
  2. Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship [095951]
  3. ETH postdoctoral fellowship
  4. HHMI Predoctoral Fellowship
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PA00P3_139727, PBZHP3-133388]
  6. NIH [U54 GM103511, R01 GM083960]
  7. ETH Zurich
  8. SystemsX
  9. ERC advanced grant [233226]
  10. SNSF
  11. National Center of Excellence in Research Structural Biology and RNA and Disease programs
  12. ERC grant [250071]
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [233226, 250071] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  14. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PA00P3_139727, PBZHP3-133388] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eukaryotic translation initiation requires the recruitment of the large, multiprotein eIF3 complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit. We present X-ray structures of all major components of the minimal, six-subunit Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF3 core. These structures, together with electron microscopy reconstructions, cross-linking coupled to mass spectrometry, and integrative structure modeling, allowed us to position and orient all eIF3 components on the 40S center dot eIF1 complex, revealing an extended, modular arrangement of eIF3 subunits. Yeast eIF3 engages 40S in a clamp-like manner, fully encircling 40S to position key initiation factors on opposite ends of the mRNA channel, providing a platform for the recruitment, assembly, and regulation of the translation initiation machinery. The structures of eIF3 components reported here also have implications for understanding the architecture of the mammalian 43S preinitiation complex and the complex of eIF3, 40S, and the hepatitis C internal ribosomal entry site RNA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available