4.4 Article

Paenibacillus kribbensis sp nov and Paenibacillus terrae sp nov., bioflocculants for efficient harvesting of algal cells

Publisher

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02108-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two strains of Gram-variable, rod-shaped, endospore-forming, peritrichously flagellated, rodshaped bacteria were isolated from a soil sample collected in Taejon City, Korea. The two strains (AM49(T) and AM141(T)) were found to be members of the genus Paenibacillus, on the basis of the results of phenotypic and phylogenetic analyses. Strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) were found to have a cell-wall peptidoglycan based on meso-diaminopimelic acid, MK-7 as their predominant menaquinone and anteiso-C-15:0 as their major fatty acid. The DNA G + C contents of strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) were 48 and 47 mol%, respectively. The two strains formed distinct phylogenetic lineages within the radiation of the cluster comprising Paenibacillus spp. and a coherent cluster with Paenibacillus jamilae, Paenibacillus polymyxa, Paenibacillus azotofixans and Paenibacillus peoriae. The level of 16S rDNA similarity between strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) was 97(.)6%, and 16S rDNA similarity values between strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) and the type strains of other Paenibacillus spp. ranged from 90(.)3 to 98(.)7%. Levels of DNA-DNA similarity between the two strains and members of the genus Paenibacillus indicated that strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) were distinguishable from each other and from four phylogenetically related Paenibacillus spp. Therefore, on the basis of their phenotypic properties, phylogeny and genomic distinctiveness, it is proposed that strains AM49(T) and AM141(T) be placed in the genus Paenibacillus as two distinct novel species, Paenibacillus kribbensis (AM49(T) =KCTC 0766BP(T) =JCM 11465(T)) and Paenibacillus terrae (AM141(T) =KCCM 41557(T) =JCM 11466(T)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available