4.7 Article

Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O-2/CO2 recycle combustion

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 44, Issue 19, Pages 3073-3091

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00040-2

Keywords

CO2 capture; MEA; O-2/CO2 recycle; Aspen plus; economics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The existing fleet of modern pulverised coal fired power plants represents an opportunity to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years providing that efficient and economical CO2 capture technologies are available for retrofit. One option is to separate CO2 from the products of combustion using conventional approaches such as amine scrubbing. An emerging alternative, commonly known as O-2/CO2 recycle combustion, involves burning the coal with oxygen in an atmosphere of recycled flue gas. Both approaches can be retrofitted to existing units, however they consume significant amounts of energy to capture, purify and compress the CO2 for subsequent sequestration. This paper presents a techno-economic comparison of the performance of the two approaches. The comparison was developed using the commercial process simulation packages, Hysys & Aspen Plus. The results show that both processes are expensive options to capture CO2 from coal power plants, however O-2/ CO, appears to be a more attractive retrofit than MEA scrubbing. The CO2 capture cost for the MEA case is USD 53/ton of CO2 avoided, which translates into 3.3 phi/kW h. For the O-2/CO2 case the CO2 capture cost is lower at USD 35/ton of CO2 avoided, which translates into 2.4 phi/kW h. These capture costs represent an approximate increase of 20-30% in current electricity prices. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available