3.8 Article

Comprehensive genome-wide comparison of DNA and RNA level scan using microarray technology for identification of candidate cancer-related genes in the HL-60 cell line

Journal

CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS
Volume 147, Issue 1, Pages 28-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4608(03)00155-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA83213] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R33CA083213, R21CA083213] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide scans for DNA and RNA changes in the HL-60 cell line relative to normal leukocytes were conducted. Microarray-based comparative genome hybridization (CGH) studies were performed with the Spectral Genomics Human Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) 3MB system. Transcriptional measurements of approximately 12,500 human genes were monitored using Affymetrix U95A GeneChips. In HL-60, genomic DNA amplification of the 8q24 locus, trisomy 18, and deletions at loci 5q11.2similar toq31, 6q12, 9p21.3similar top22, 10p12similar top15, 14q22similar toq31, 17p12similar top13.3, and monosomy X were detected. After obtaining locus information about the RNA transcripts from the Affymetrix database, 4368 genes were stratified both according to status of RNA expression and the DNA copy number of their designated loci. The expression level of 2326 (53.25%) of 4368 transcripts is concordant with DNA copy number. Examples of specific, highly expressed, cancer-associated genes in amplified loci include SERPINB10, MYC, TYMS, HEC, and EPB41L3, while CD14, GZMK, TCF7, FOS, MLH3, CTNNA1, IRFI, VIM, CRK, MAP3K1, STAM, MAX, SFRG5, ENC1, PURA, MNT RASA1, GLRX, UBE2B, NR3C1, PTENP1, BS69, COPEB, SKIP, PIM2, and MIC2 represent cancer-associated genes in deleted loci with decreased expression. The complementary usage of genome-wide DNA and RNA scans should enhance the identification of candidate genes in the neoplastic process. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available