4.4 Article

First clinical results of the Locking Compression Plate (LCP)

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.024

Keywords

first clinical results; fracture; non-union; LCP; angular stability; complication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Locking Compression Plate (LCP) is a new screw-plate system that offers the possibility of inserting conventional and locking head screws into the specially designed combination holes. It represents a further development of the PC-Fix and the LISS and was released for clinical application in March 2000. In a prospective multicentre study, the new system was used to treat 144 patients (f: 67, m: 77; average age: 51.4 years) with 169 fractures: of these, 57 were tibial fractures, 45 humerus, 19 radius and 18 femoral. After one year, clinical and radiological follow-up assessment was carried out on 127 patients with 151 fractures (88%). In 130 fractures (86%), healing took place within the expected period and without complication or secondary dislocation (uneventful healing). In 19 patients, a total of 27 unexpected complications occurred (adverse events), in which 18 revision operations were necessary in 13 patients: five for implant loosening/pull-out, four for plate failure, one for non-union, five for secondary fractures immediately adjacent to the implant after a subsequent injury and two for infection. Analysis by a committee of experts indicated that mechanical complications arose entirely from technical errors of application (incorrect fixation technique, incorrect choice of plate). No purely implant-related complications were observed. The new system can be regarded as technically mature. It offers numerous fixation possibilities and has proven its worth in complex fracture situations and in revision operations after the failure of other implants. A good knowledge of biomechanics is essential as well as precise preoperative planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available