4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified?

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 946-950

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.004

Keywords

distal pancreatectomy; pancreatic adenocarcinoma; pancreatic resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with body. or tail tumors of the pancreas often have contiguous organ involvement or portalsplenic confluence adherence requiring extensive resection in order to obtain grossly negative margins. The aim of this study was to determine whether long-term survival is possible after contiguous organ or portal vein resection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. Between 1983 and 2000, a total of 513 patients with adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas were identified from a prospective database. Distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy was performed in 57 patients (11%). Extended resection was necessary in 22 patients (39%): 14 (64%) for contiguous organ involvement and eight (36%) for portal vein resection Estimated blood loss, blood transfused, and length of hospital stay were significantly greater in patients requiring extended resection compared to standard resection (P = 0.02, P = 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). Median follow-up for patients still alive was 84 months (range 40 to 189 months). Median survival following resection was 15.9 months compared to 5.8 months in patients who were not resected (P < 0.0001). Actual 5- and 10-year survival rates were 22% and 18%, respectively, following extended resection, 8% and 8% following standard resection, and 0% and 0% if no resection was attempted because of locally unresectable disease. Patients undergoing extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body or tail have long-term survival rates similar to those for patients undergoing standard resection; they also have markedly improved long-term survival compared to those who are not considered resectable because of locally advanced disease. Extended distal pancreatectomy is justified in this group of patients. (C) 2003 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available