4.8 Article

HSF1 Drives a Transcriptional Program Distinct from Heat Shock to Support Highly Malignant Human Cancers

Journal

CELL
Volume 150, Issue 3, Pages 549-562

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.031

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. J&J COSAT focused funding program
  2. Marble Fund
  3. American Cancer Society New England Division-SpinOdyssey [PF-09-253-01-DMC]
  4. NIH [K08NS064168]
  5. Brain Science Foundation
  6. V Foundation
  7. GSK [WE234 EPI40307]
  8. Public Health Service Grants [CA087969]
  9. SPORE in Breast Cancer NCI, NIH, Dept. of Health and Human Services [CA089393]
  10. Breast Cancer Research Foundation, NCI [R01-CA146445-01]
  11. DoD-CDMRP Breast Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-08-1-0282 BC-07456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat-Shock Factor 1 (HSF1), master regulator of the heat-shock response, facilitates malignant transformation, cancer cell survival, and proliferation in model systems. The common assumption is that these effects are mediated through regulation of heat-shock protein (HSP) expression. However, the transcriptional network that HSF1 coordinates directly in malignancy and its relationship to the heat-shock response have never been defined. By comparing cells with high and low malignant potential alongside their nontransformed counterparts, we identify an HSF1-regulated transcriptional program specific to highly malignant cells and distinct from heat shock. Cancer-specific genes in this program support oncogenic processes: cell-cycle regulation, signaling, metabolism, adhesion and translation. HSP genes are integral to this program, however, many are uniquely regulated in malignancy. This HSF1 cancer program is active in breast, colon and lung tumors isolated directly from human patients and is strongly associated with metastasis and death. Thus, HSF1 rewires the transcriptome in tumorigenesis, with prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available