Journal
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 100, Issue 2-3, Pages 265-273Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00184-1
Keywords
available nutrients; ferralitic soil; QUEFTS; mulch; NPK fertilizers; nutrient balance
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Four on-farm experiments examined whether modest applications of fertilizers in combination with prunings from native agroforestry trees would be an alternative to maintain the fertility of ferralitic soils in Benin. An application of about 1.9 t ha(-1) dry matter of mulch of Senna siamea combined with 30 kg N ha(-1) 22 kg P ha(-1) and 25 kg K ha(-1) as compound fertilizer was compared with (1) 60 kg N ha(-1), 43 kg P ha(-1) and 50 kg K ha(-1) as compound fertilizer alone, (2) mulch of S. siamea alone (about 3.2 t ha(-1) dry matter), and (3) a control treatment. Criteria were soil properties, yields, nutrient uptakes, and nutrient budgets. Application of sole mulch had no significant effects (P > 0.05) on maize yields, while combined application of prunings and NPK fertilizers or sole NPK increased yields significantly (P < 0.05). The most limiting nutrient was P. The local maize cultivar was efficient in P uptake, but not in internal nutrient utilization efficiency; mulch increased significantly the internal P utilization efficiency (P < 0.05). Soil properties were interpreted with the QUEFTS (quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils) computer program. The predicted and measured yields were almost the same for maize without NPK. The measured responses to NPK were much lower than the responses calculated by QUEFTS. The calculated nutrient budgets were split into balances for available nutrients and for those not immediately available (NIA). Nutrient budgets were negative for the control and sole mulch treatments, and positive for the NPK treatments. Mulch improved the balances of NIA nutrients. The present experiment could not prove that combining NPK with mulch is the best option for sustainable agriculture. It may be more economical to apply lower rates of fertilizer to local maize than those applied in the two NPK treatments in the present study. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available