4.8 Article

A Subpopulation of Adult Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells Retains All Template DNA Strands after Cell Division

Journal

CELL
Volume 148, Issue 1-2, Pages 112-125

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.049

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Conseil de la Region Ile-de-France
  2. MICINN
  3. European Union (EU)
  4. European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Lilly Foundation
  6. Korber European Research Award
  7. Institut Pasteur
  8. Association Recherche contre le Cancer
  9. Association Francaise contre le Myopathies
  10. Centre national de la recherche scientifique
  11. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-06-BLAN-0039]
  12. Optistem
  13. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  14. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0039] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite cells are adult skeletal muscle stem cells that are quiescent and constitute a poorly defined heterogeneous population. Using transgenic Tg:Pax7-nGFP mice, we show that Pax7-nGFP(Hi) cells are less primed for commitment and have a lower metabolic status and delayed first mitosis compared to Pax7-nGFP(Lo) cells. Pax7-nGFP(Hi) can give rise to Pax7-nGFP(Lo) cells after serial transplantations. Proliferating Pax7-nGFP(Hi) cells exhibit lower metabolic activity, and the majority performs asymmetric DNA segregation during cell division, wherein daughter cells retaining template DNA strands express stem cell markers. Using chromosome orientation-fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrate that all chromatids segregate asymmetrically, whereas Pax7-nGFP(Lo) cells perform random DNA segregation. Therefore, quiescent Pax7-nGFP(Hi) cells represent a reversible dormant stem cell state, and during muscle regeneration, Pax7-nGFP(Hi) cells generate distinct daughter cell fates by asymmetrically segregating template DNA strands to the stem cell. These findings provide major insights into the biology of stem cells that segregate DNA asymmetrically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available