4.7 Review

Designing climate-resilient rice with ideal grain quality suited for high-temperature stress

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 66, Issue 7, Pages 1737-1748

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eru544

Keywords

Chalk; functional genomics; genetics; grain quality; milling and head rice yield; stress tolerance; systems biology; systems genetics

Categories

Funding

  1. CGIAR thematic area Global Rice Science Partnership (GRISP), Stress-Tolerant Rice for Africa
  2. South Asia (STRASA)
  3. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research [CIM/2014/024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To ensure rice food security, the target outputs of future rice breeding programmes should focus on developing climate-resilient rice varieties with emphasis on increased head rice yield coupled with superior grain quality. This challenge is made greater by a world that is increasingly becoming warmer. Such environmental changes dramatically impact head rice and milling yield as well as increasing chalkiness because of impairment in starch accumulation and other storage biosynthetic pathways in the grain. This review highlights the knowledge gained through gene discovery via quantitative trait locus (QTL) cloning and structural-functional genomic strategies to reduce chalk, increase head rice yield, and develop stable lines with optimum grain quality in challenging environments. The newly discovered genes and the knowledge gained on the influence of specific alleles related to stability of grain quality attributes provide a robust platform for marker-assisted selection in breeding to design heat-tolerant rice varieties with superior grain quality. Using the chalkiness trait in rice as a case study, we demonstrate here that the emerging field of systems genetics can help fast-track the identification of novel alleles and gene targets that can be pyramided for the development of environmentally robust rice varieties that possess improved grain quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available