4.6 Article

Size effect of intratracheally instilled particles on pulmonary inflammation and vascular thrombosis

Journal

TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 1, Pages 38-45

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0041-008X(02)00024-8

Keywords

air pollution; particles; thrombosis; lung; inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particulate air pollution is associated with cardiorespiratory effects and ultrafine particles (UFPs, diameter < 100 nm) are believed to play an important role. We studied the acute (1 h) effect of intratracheally instilled unmodified (00 nm), negatively charged carboxylate-modified (60 nm), or positively charged amine-modified (60 or 400 nm) polystyrene particles on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) indices and on peripheral thrombosis in hamster. The latter was assessed by measuring the extent of photochchemically induced thrombosis in a femoral vein via transillumination. Unmodified and negative UFPs did not modify thrombosis and BAL indices. Positive c UFPs increased thrombosis at 500 mug per animal (+ 341 +/- 96%) and at 50 mug per animal (+ 533 +/- 122%). but not at 5 mug per animal. Neutrophils, lactate dehydrogenase, and histamine were increased in BAL at all these doses but protein concentration was increased only at 500 mug per animal. Positive 400-nm particles (500 mug per animal) did not affect thrombosis, although they led to a neutrophil influx and in increase in BAL proteins and histamine. Using the Platelet Function Analyser (PFA-100). the platelets of banisters were activated by the in vitro addition of positive UFPs and 400-nm particles to blood. We conclude that intratracheally administred positive ultrafine and 400-nm particles induce pulmonary inflammation within 1 h. Positive UFPs, but not the 400-nm particles enhance thrombosis, Hence, particle-induced lung inflammation and thrombogenesis can be partially uncoupled. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available