4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Transection of the adult rat spinal cord upregulates EphB3 receptor and ligand expression

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 279-290

Publisher

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/000000003108746830

Keywords

axon guidance; immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridization; receptor protein tyrosine kinases

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [G12RR003051, P20RR015576] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [U54NS039405] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [G12RR03051, RR15576] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIGMS NIH HHS [506GM08224] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39405] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eph receptors and ligands represent two families of proteins that control axonal guidance during development. Recent work has shown that several Eph receptors are expressed postnatally. Because the Eph molecules represent a class of axon guidance molecules that are mainly inhibitory to axonal growth, we investigated whether EphB3 expression was upregulated in both spinal cord and four supraspinal nuclei (locus coeruleus, vestibular, raphe pallidus, and red) 1 week after a complete spinal cord thoracic transection. Injured rats had a significant increase in EphB3 mRNA and protein expression in the spinal cord. The increased EphB3 expression was colocalized with GFAP staining and indicated that astrocytes play a role in EphB3 expression after spinal cord injury. No change in EphB3 expression was seen in supraspinal brain nuclei, which further demonstrated that changes in expression were due to changes in the local microenvironment at the injury site. The expression of EphB3 was colocalized to regions of the CNS that had a high level of EphB3 binding ligands. These data indicate upregulation of EphB3 expression after injury may also contribute to an environment in the spinal cord that is inhibitory to axonal regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available