3.8 Article

Electrophysiological indicators of phonetic and non-phonetic multisensory interactions during audiovisual speech perception

Journal

COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 65-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.004

Keywords

audiovisual interaction; multisensory processing; event-related potential (ERP); speech perception

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied the interactions in neural processing of auditory and visual speech by recording event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Unisensory (auditory-A and visual-V) and audiovisual (AV) vowels were presented to 11 subjects. AV vowels were phonetically either congruent (e.g., acoustic /a/ and visual /a/) or incongruent (e.g., acoustic /a/ and visual /y/. ERPs to AV stimuli and the sum of the ERPs to A and V stimuli (A + V) were compared. Similar ERPs to AV and A + V were hypothesized to indicate independent processing of A and V stimuli. Differences on the other hand would suggest AV interactions. Three deflections, the first peaking at about 85 ms after the A stimulus onset, were significantly larger in the ERPs to A + V than in the ERPs to both congruent and incongruent AV stimuli. We suggest that these differences reflect AV interactions in the processing of general, non-phonetic, features shared by the acoustic and visual stimulus (spatial location, coincidence in time). The first difference in the ERPs to incongruent and congruent AV vowels peaked at 155 ms from the A stimuli onset. This and two later differences are suggested to reflect interactions at phonetic level. The early general AV interactions probably reflect modified activity in the sensory-specific cortices, whereas the later phonetic AV interactions are likely generated in the heteromodal cortices. Thus, our results suggest that sensory-specific and heteromodal brain regions participate in AV speech integration at separate latencies and are sensitive to different features of A and V speech stimuli. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available