4.8 Article

T cell-specific siRNA delivery suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice

Journal

CELL
Volume 134, Issue 4, Pages 577-586

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.034

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [RO1 A1071882, R21 AI06532, AI075419]
  2. Korea Ministry of Education and Science Technology [R01-2006-000-10506-0, F104AA010005-07A0101-00510]
  3. Seoul RBD [CR070027]
  4. CFAR [P30 A060354]
  5. NIH [CA34196]
  6. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  7. MOEHRD [KRF-2006-352-D00070]
  8. Wilhelm Sander Foundation
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2006-000-10506-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluation of the therapeutic potential of RNAi for HIV infection has been hampered by the challenges of siRNA delivery and lack of suitable animal models. Using a delivery method for T cells, we show that siRNA treatment can dramatically suppress HIV infection. A CD7-specific single-chain antibody was conjugated to oligo-9-arginine peptide (scFvCD79R) for T cell-specific siRNA delivery in NOD/SCIDIL2r gamma(-/-) mice reconstituted with human lymphocytes (Hu-PBL) or CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells (Hu-HSC). In HIV-infected Hu-PBL mice, treatment with anti-CCR5 (viral coreceptor) and antiviral siRNAs complexed to scFvCD7-9R controlled viral replication and prevented the disease-associated CD4 T cell loss. This treatment also suppressed endogenous virus and restored CD4 T cell counts in mice reconstituted with HIV+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Moreover, scFvCD7-9R could deliver antiviral siRNAs to naive T cells in Hu-HSC mice and effectively suppress viremia in infected mice. Thus, siRNA therapy for HIV infection appears to be feasible in a preclinical animal model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available