4.7 Article

Transformation zones, crack shielding, and crack-growth resistance of Ce-TZP/alumina composite in mode II and combined mode II and mode I loading

Journal

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 70, Issue 18, Pages 2569-2585

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00067-5

Keywords

transformation toughening; mode II loading; transformation zones; crack shielding

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crack-tip transformation zones, crack shielding and crack-growth-resistance (R-curve) behaviors of a transformation-toughened ceria-partially stabilized zirconia-alumina (Ce-TZP/alumina) composite were studied in mode II and combined mode I and mode II loading using compact-tension-shear (CTS) specimens. The mode I I and mode I stress intensities for both the initial straight cracks and the subsequent kinked cracks were assessed by the method of caustics using geometrically equivalent specimens of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). The angle of formation of the transformation zones as well as of extension of the cracks increased systematically with increasing ratio of the mode II and the mode I stress intensities and approached a value of theta* = -72degrees in pure mode II loading. This angle was close to the angle for maximum hoop tension in the stress field of a mode II crack (theta* = -70.5degrees). A crack-initiation toughness envelope was constructed on a K-I-K-II diagram using the critical loads for incremental crack extension. The crack-initiation toughness in pure mode II loading was less than the corresponding toughness in mode I loading. This result was consistent with calculations that indicated no shielding from the asymmetric and elongated zones developed in mode II loading. The fracture toughness measured for the kinked cracks at long kink lengths approached the maximum fracture toughness measured for a mode I crack. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available