4.4 Article

Mechanism of the positive contractile effect of nitric oxide on rat ventricular cardiomyocytes with positive force/frequency relationship

Journal

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 447, Issue 3, Pages 289-297

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-003-1187-8

Keywords

NO donor; frequency; G protein; cGMP; beta-adrenoceptors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The positive contractile effect of nitric oxide (NO) donors was studied on isolated rat ventricular cardiomyocytes within a range of a positive force/frequency relationship. We determined whether the observed effect depended on cGMP. The NO donors S-nitroso-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP) and N-{4-[1-(3-aminopropyl)-2-hydroxy-2-nitrosohydrazino]butyl}-1,3-propanediamine (spermine-NONO) increased contractile responsiveness transiently in a concentration- and frequency-dependent manner. The influence of NO donors on cGMP levels was enhanced under beating conditions. The positive contractile effect of NO donors was inhibited by adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphothioate Rp diastereomer (Rp-cAMPS), but not by bisindolylmaleimide. Inhibition of the soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) by 1H-[1,2,4]-oxadiazole-[4,3-a]-quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) inhibited the positive contractile effect of NO donors. Direct activation of sGC by 3-(5'-hydroxymethyl-2'-furyl)-1-benzylindazole (YC1) or addition of 8-bromo cGMP increased cell contractility comparably to NO donors. Inhibition of G(alphas) proteins by NF441 inhibited the positive contractile effect of NO donors. In contrast, NO donors did not potentiate the positive contractile effect of forskolin. These results demonstrate that the positive contractile effect of NO donors on rat ventricular cardiomyocytes working in a range of a positive force/frequency relationships is enhanced. It is mediated by NO-dependent stimulation of the sGC interacting with G(alphas) proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available