Journal
HORMONE RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 180-183Publisher
KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000069321
Keywords
growth prediction; target height; conditional target height; parent-allowed-for standard; mid-parental height; height SDS
Categories
Funding
- MRC [G9827821] Funding Source: UKRI
- Medical Research Council [G9827821] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To correct the calculation of target height (TH) for assortative mating and parent-offspring correlations. Methods: Define the standard deviation score (SDS) of TH as the mean parental height SDS: TH SDS = (Father SDS + Mother SDS)2. This needs correcting for assortative mating and regression bias, using r(P,P) the parent-parent correlation and r(P,O) the parent-off spring correlation. Together they give the conditional target height (cTH SDS): cTH SDS = TH SDS x r(P,O) x root2/(1 + -r(PP)) + error where the error term has mean 0 and standard deviation root1 - r(p,O)(2). Results: We assume r(P,P) = 0.27 and r(P,O) = 0.57, based on the Swedish data of Luo et al. [Pediatr Res 1998;44:563-571], so that: cTH SDS = TH SDS x 0.57 x root2/1 + 0.27) = TH SDS x 0.72 with a 95% confidence interval of +/-1.6 SDS units. The formula is independent of sex, and if parental height SDS is obtained from growth charts dating back one generation, the formula is also independent of secular height changes. Conclusions: cTH SDS is equal to only 0.72 times the average of father's and mother's height SDS. Current practice ignores this scaling factor, so that the children of short parents are ascribed a TH which is as much as 4 cm too low. This will tend to exaggerate the benefits of growth-promoting therapies. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available