4.5 Review

Pancultural self-enhancement

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 60-79

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.60

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The culture movement challenged the universality of the self-enhancement motive by proposing that the motive is pervasive in individualistic cultures (the West) but absent in collectivistic cultures (the East). The present research posited that Westerners and Easterners use different tactics to achieve the same goal: positive self-regard. Study I tested participants from differing cultural backgrounds (the United States vs. Japan), and Study 2 tested participants of differing self-construals (independent vs. interdependent). Americans and independents self-enhanced on individualistic attributes. whereas Japanese and interdependents self-enhanced on collectivistic attributes. Independents regarded individualistic attributes, whereas interdependents regarded collectivistic attributes, as personally important. Attribute importance mediated self-enhancement. Regardless of cultural background or self-construal. people self-enhance on personally important dimensions. Self-enhancement is a universal human motive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available