4.3 Article

The impella recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Medicine, General & Internal

Elective Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation During High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Randomized Controlled Trial

Divaka Perera et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Usefulness of the SYNTAX Score for Predicting Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Davide Capodanno et al.

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2009)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Supported High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Impella 2.5 Device The Europella Registry

Krischan D. Sjauw et al.

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2009)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics

Maurice Remmelink et al.

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2007)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Role of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Sundeep Mishra et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2006)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting

Carlo Briguori et al.

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2006)