4.4 Article

Effect of a short CAG (glutamine) repeat on human androgen receptor functin

Journal

PROSTATE
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 23-32

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/pros.10316

Keywords

polymorphism; prostate cancer; transactivation; immunoblot; alleles

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA58236, CA68645] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA058236, R01CA068645] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. The human androgen receptor (AR) gene contains an uninterrupted CAG repeat that is polymorphic in length in the general population (range, 11-31 CAG's; median, 21). The CAG repeat encodes a glutamine repeat in the N-terminal transactivation domain of the AR protein. We previously reported that a 17-CAG AR gene was much more common in a cohort of men with prostate cancer (8.5%) than in the general European American population (1.3%). This suggested that a 17-CAG repeat may have pathophysiological consequences. The goal of the present study was to directly test the hypothesis that a 17-CAG repeat might uniquely affect androgen action in human prostate cancer cells. METHODS. DU145 cells, lacking endogenous AR, were transiently transfected with an AR expression plasmid (with a CAG repeat ranging in length from 14 to 25) and an androgen-responsive reporter plasmid (PSA-luciferase). RESULTS. We found a significant effect of CAG repeat length on AR protein levels per unit amount of DNA transfected (one-way ANOVA, P = 0.02), indicating the need to express transactivation data per unit amount of AR protein. CAG17 AR had 40% more transactivation activity per unit amount of AR protein than CAG21 AR (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS. Thus, an AR with a 17-CAG repeat may mediate more efficacious growth stimulation of androgen-dependent prostate epithelial cells, and thereby increase the risk that prostate cancer cells develop more efficiently into a clinically significant cancer. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available